Rubric (academic)

From Wikipedia, the không tính tiền encyclopedia

This article is about rubrics in academic sense. For other uses, see Rubric (disambiguation).

In US education terminology, a rubric is "a scoring guide used đồ sộ evaluate the quality of students' constructed responses".^[1] Put simply, it is a phối of criteria for grading assignments. Rubrics usually contain evaluative criteria, quality definitions for those criteria at particular levels of achievement, and a scoring strategy.^[1] They are often presented in table format and can be used by teachers when marking, and by students when planning their work.^[2] In UK education, the rubric is the phối of instructions at the head of an examination paper.

A scoring rubric is an attempt đồ sộ communicate expectations of quality around a task. In many cases, scoring rubrics are used đồ sộ delineate consistent criteria for grading. Because the criteria are public, a scoring rubric allows teachers and students alike đồ sộ evaluate criteria, which can be complex and subjective. A scoring rubric can also provide a basis for self-evaluation, reflection, and peer review. It is aimed at accurate and fair assessment, fostering understanding, and indicating a way đồ sộ proceed with subsequent learning/teaching. This integration of performance and feedback is called ongoing assessment or formative assessment.

Several common features of scoring rubrics can be distinguished, according đồ sộ Bernie Dodge and Nancy Pickett:^[3]

They focus on measuring a stated objective (performance, behavior, or quality).
They use a range đồ sộ rate performance.
They contain specific performance characteristics arranged in levels indicating either the developmental sophistication of the strategy used or the degree đồ sộ which a standard has been met.

Components of a scoring rubric[edit]

Scoring rubrics include one or more dimensions on which performance is rated, definitions and examples that illustrate the attribute(s) being measured, and a rating scale for each dimension. Dimensions are generally referred đồ sộ as criteria, the rating scale as levels, and definitions as descriptors.

Herman, Aschbacher, and Winters^[4] distinguish the following elements of a scoring rubric:

One or more traits or dimensions that serve as the basis for judging the student response
Definitions and examples đồ sộ clarify the meaning of each trait or dimension
A scale of values on which đồ sộ rate each dimension
Standards of excellence for specified performance levels accompanied by models or examples of each level

Since the 1980s, many scoring rubrics have been presented in a graphic format, typically as a grid. Studies of scoring rubric effectiveness now consider the efficiency of a grid over, say, a text-based list of criteria.^{[citation needed]}

Rubrics can be classified as holistic, analytic, or developmental. Holistic rubrics integrate all aspects of the work into a single overall rating of the work. For example, "the terms and grades commonly used at university (i.e., excellent – A, good – B, average – C, poor – D, and weak – E) usually express an assessor's overall rating of a piece of work. When a research article or thesis is evaluated, the reviewer is asked đồ sộ express his or her opinion in holistic terms – accept as is, accept with minor revisions, require major revisions for a second review, or reject. The classification response is a weighted judgement by the assessor taking all things into trương mục at once; hence, holistic. In contrast, an analytic rubric specifies various dimensions or components of the product or process that are evaluated separately. The same rating scale labels may be used as the holistic, but it is applied đồ sộ various key dimensions or aspects separately rather phàn nàn an integrated judgement. This separate specification means that on one dimension the work could be excellent, but on one or more other dimensions the work might be poor đồ sộ average. Most commonly, analytic rubrics have been used by teachers đồ sộ score student writing when the teacher awards a separate score for such facets of written language as conventions or mechanics (i.e., spelling, punctuation, and grammar), organisation, nội dung or ideas, and style. They are also used in many other domains of the school curriculum (e.g., performing arts, sports and athletics, studio arts, wood and metal technologies, etc.). By breaking the whole into significant dimensions or components and rating them separately, it is expected that better information will be obtained by the teacher and the student about what needs đồ sộ be worked on next." (Brown, Irving, & Keegan, năm trước, p. 55).^[5] Developmental rubrics are analytical but also meet developmental characteristics described below.

Steps đồ sộ create a scoring rubric[edit]

Scoring rubrics may help students become thoughtful evaluators of their own and others' work and may reduce the amount of time teachers spend evaluating student work. Here is a five-step method đồ sộ creating and using a scoring rubric for writing assignments:^[6]

Have students look at models of good versus "not-so-good" work. A teacher should provide sample assignments of variable quality for students đồ sộ review.
List the criteria đồ sộ be used in the scoring rubric and allow for discussion of what counts as quality work. Asking for student feedback during the creation of the list also allows the teacher đồ sộ assess the students' overall writing experiences.
Articulate gradations of quality. These hierarchical categories should concisely describe the levels of quality (ranging from bad đồ sộ good) or development (ranging from beginning đồ sộ mastery). They can be based on the discussion of the good versus not-so-good work samples or immature versus developed samples. Using a conservative number of gradations keeps the scoring rubric user-friendly while allowing for fluctuations that exist within the average range ("creating rubrics").
Practice on models. Students can test the scoring rubrics on sample assignments provided by the instructor. This practice can build students' confidence by teaching them how the instructor would use the scoring rubric on their papers. It can also aid student/teacher agreement on the reliability of the scoring rubric.
Ask for self and peer-assessment.

When đồ sộ use scoring rubrics[edit]

A rubric can be used in individual assessment within the course, or a project or capstone project. However, it can be used when multiple evaluators are evaluating the assessment đồ sộ get focus on the contributing attributes for the evaluation. Rubrics are ideally suited for project assessment since each component of the project has a corresponding section on the rubric that specifies criteria for quality of work.

Xem thêm: subsequent là gì

Revise the work on the basis of that feedback. As students are working on their assignment, they can be stopped occasionally đồ sộ bởi a self-assessment and then give and receive evaluations from their peers. Revisions should be based on the feedback they receive.
Use teacher assessment, which means using the same scoring rubric the students used đồ sộ assess their work.

Developmental rubrics[edit]

Developmental rubrics are analytic rubrics that use multiple dimensions of developmental successions đồ sộ facilitate assessment, instructional design, and transformative learning.^[7]

Defining developmental rubrics[edit]

Developmental rubrics refer đồ sộ a matrix of modes of practice. Practices belong đồ sộ a community of experts.^[8] Each mode of practice competes with a few others within the same dimension. Modes appear in succession because their frequency is determined by four parameters: endemicity, performance rate, commitment strength, and acceptance. Transformative learning results in changing from one mode đồ sộ the next. The typical developmental modes can be roughly identified as beginning, exploring, sustaining, and inspiring. The timing of the four levels is unique đồ sộ each dimension and it is common đồ sộ find beginning or exploring modes in one dimension coexisting with sustaining or inspiring modes in another. Often, the modes within a dimension are given unique names in addition đồ sộ the typical identifier. As a result, developmental rubrics have four properties:

They are descriptions of examples of behaviors.
They contain multiple dimensions each consisting of a few modes of practice that cannot be used simultaneously with other modes in the dimension.
The modes of practice within a dimension show a dynamic succession of levels.
They can be created for extremely diverse scales of times and places.

Creating developmental rubrics[edit]

Since practices belong đồ sộ a community, the first step is đồ sộ locate a group of practitioners, who are expert in their field and experienced with learners.
Next, each practitioner works with an expert developmental interviewer đồ sộ create a matrix that best reflects their experiences. Once several interviews have been completed they can be combined within a single phối of developmental rubrics for the community through individual or computerized text analysis.
Third, the community of experts rate learner performances and meet đồ sộ compare ratings of the same performances and revise the definitions when multiple interpretations are discovered.
Fourth, instructors of particular courses share the developmental rubrics with students and identify the target modes of practice for the course. Typically, a course targets only a fraction of the dimensions of the community's developmental rubrics and only one mode of practice within each of the target dimensions.
Finally, the rubrics are used real-time đồ sộ motivate student development, usually focusing on one dimension at a time and discussing the opportunities đồ sộ perform at the next mode of practice in succession.

Etymology and history[edit]

The traditional meanings of the word rubric stem from "a heading on a document (often written in red—from Latin, rubrica, red ochre, red ink), or a direction for conducting church services".^[9] Drawing on definition 2 in the OED for this word,^[10] rubrics referred đồ sộ the instructions on a test đồ sộ the test-taker as đồ sộ how questions were đồ sộ be answered. This definition of "rubric" is still sometimes used, especially in the UK.^[11] In modern Italian, 'rubrica' means column, in the print context, ví this term also refers đồ sộ a visual structure of information. Many early Medieval texts were written in multiple columns on a single page.

In modern education circles, rubrics have recently come đồ sộ refer đồ sộ an assessment tool. The first usage of the term in this new sense is from the mid-1990s, but scholarly articles from that time bởi not explain why the term was co-opted. Perhaps rubrics are seen đồ sộ act, in both cases, as metadata added đồ sộ text đồ sộ indicate what constitutes a successful use of that text. It may also be that the color of the traditional red marking pen is the common liên kết.

The bridge from medicine đồ sộ education occurred through the construction of "Standardized Developmental Ratings." These were first defined for writing assessment in the mid-1970s^[12] and used đồ sộ train raters for the Thủ đô New York State Regents Exam in Writing by the late 1970s.^[13] That exam required raters đồ sộ use multidimensional standardized developmental ratings đồ sộ determine a holistic score. The term "rubrics" was applied đồ sộ such ratings by Grubb^[14] in a book advocating holistic scoring rather phàn nàn developmental rubrics. Developmental rubrics return đồ sộ the original intent of standardized developmental ratings, which was đồ sộ tư vấn student self-reflection and self-assessment as well as communication between an assessor and those being assessed. In this new sense, a scoring rubric is a phối of criteria and standards typically linked đồ sộ learning objectives. It is used đồ sộ assess or communicate about product, performance, or process tasks.

Technical[edit]

Scoring rubrics can also improve scoring consistency. Grading is more reliable while using a rubric phàn nàn without one.^[15] Educators can refer đồ sộ a rubric while scoring assignments đồ sộ keep grading consistent between students. Teachers can also use rubrics đồ sộ keep their scoring consistent between other teachers who teach the same class.

References[edit]

^ ^a ^b Popham, James (October 1997). "What's Wrong - and What's Right - with Rubrics". Educational Leadership. 55 (2): 72–75.
^ Dawson, Phillip (December 2015). "Assessment rubrics: towards clearer and more replicable design, research and practice". Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 42 (3): 347–360. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.703.8431. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294. S2CID 146330707.
^ "Rubrics for Web Lessons". 2007. Retrieved 2020-04-21.
^ Herman, Joan (January 1992). A Practical Guide đồ sộ Alternative Assessment. Association for Supervision & Curriculum Deve. ISBN 978-0871201973.
^ Brown, G. T. L., Irving, S. E., & Keegan, P.. J. (2014). An introduction đồ sộ educational assessment, measurement, and evaluation: Improving the quality of teacher-based assessment (3rd ed.). Auckland, NZ: Dunmore Publishing. ISBN 9781927212097
^ Goodrich, H. (1996). "Understanding Rubrics." Educational Leadership, 54 (4), 14-18.
^ Dirlam, D. K. (2017). "Teachers, learners, modes of practice: Theory and methodology for identifying Knowledge Development." New York: Routledge.
^ Wenger, E., McDermott, R. & Snyder, W. M. (2002). "Cultivating Communities of Practice." Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
^ "The definition of rubric".
^ "Rubric | Definition of rubric in English by Oxford Dictionaries".^{[dead link]}
^ "University of Exeter".
^ Dirlam, David; Byrne, Maureen (1978-02-28). "Standardized Developmental Ratings". Archived from the original on 2012-07-29.
^ Dirlam, D. K. (1980). Classifiers and cognitive development. In S. & C. Modgil (Eds.), Toward a Theory of Psychological Development. Windsor, England: NFER Publishing, 465-498
^ Grubb, Mel. (1981). Using Holistic Evaluation. Encino, Cal.: Glenco Publishing Company, Inc.
^ Jonsson, Anders; Svingby, Gunilla (2007). "The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences". Educational Research Review. 2 (2): 130–144. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002.